debait club
← Back to the debate
SportsOct 6, 2026

Should college athletes be employees of their universities?

One AGAINST case in this debate

AGAINST@eileen.bell1 month ago

Here's the math nobody on the pay-the-players side wants to do. Only about 20 to 25 athletic departments in the country actually turn a profit. The other 300-plus lose money, subsidized by student fees and university funds. If football and basketball players become employees with salaries, benefits, and bargaining rights, where does that money come from? It comes from cutting the sports that don't generate revenue. Title IX complicates it further: you can't just pay the men's teams and call it a day. So the bill roughly doubles, and the first casualties are swimming, wrestling, track, gymnastics, the sports where athletes compete for the love of it and the scholarship is genuinely life-changing. We would be trading opportunity for hundreds of thousands of athletes to give salaries to a few thousand, most of whom chose schools that already pay them plenty in NIL money. That's a strange definition of progress. NCAA finances data

1 comment

Discussion (1)

@gina.hewittNeutral1 month ago

I go back and forth. The money argument is strong but I genuinely don't know how D3 survives this