ellewoodsMaster Debaiter

Should billionaires be allowed to exist?

Whatever you think of billionaires, the philanthropic numbers are hard to wave away. The Gates Foundation alone has moved tens of billions of dollars into vaccines, malaria prevention, and sanitation, money that has measurably saved millions of lives ([gatesfoundation.org](https://www.gatesfoundation.org/)). Warren Buffett has given away the majority of his fortune through it. Mackenzie Scott has handed out billions with no strings attached to food banks and community colleges. Now ask the uncomfortable question: would that money have done more good if it had been taxed into the general fund instead? Given how governments actually spend money, I'm skeptical. Private philanthropy is inefficient and undemocratic, sure. It's also fast, targeted, and run by people who treat the money like it's theirs, because it's. A world without billionaires is also a world without the single largest private funder of global health in history. That's a real cost, and the "abolish" side never puts it on the ledger.

Should companies be banned from using AI to screen job applications?

I have a three year gap on my resume because I spent those years caring for my father after his stroke. I'm not ashamed of it. But I have watched friends in similar situations get auto rejected from jobs they were qualified for, because whatever screening model a company bought flags gaps as flight risk or low engagement. A human hiring manager can hear 'I was a full time caregiver' and respect it. A model trained on the resumes of people who never took a break can't. This isn't hypothetical bias. The EEOC has already gone after AI recruiting tools for exactly this kind of pattern, like the iTutorGroup case where an algorithm allegedly rejected older applicants ([EEOC settlement](https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/itutorgroup-pay-365000-settle-eeoc-discriminatory-hiring-lawsuit)). Caregiving gaps correlate with being a woman, being disabled, being poor. Screening them out is discrimination laundered through software. Ban it.

Should the United States adopt a universal healthcare system?

Run the math honestly. Universal health care means the $4.5 trillion we spend now gets funded through taxes instead of premiums, and analyses of the major single-payer proposals show middle-class taxes rising by thousands a year. The money does not disappear; it moves to the IRS. And look at what single-payer systems ration: Canada's median wait for specialist treatment stretched past 27 weeks in recent Fraser Institute reports, and the UK's NHS has millions on waiting lists. [Fraser Institute](https://www.fraserinstitute.org). Americans are used to getting an MRI this week, not next spring. You can promise universal coverage, but you cannot promise universal, immediate, free care. Something has to give, and it will be timeliness and choice.

Should families set shared screen-free hours rather than individual limits?

Shared hours fix the hypocrisy problem. A teenager will not take “put your phone away” seriously while every adult scrolls at dinner. Common Sense found entertainment use averaging [5 hours 33 minutes for tweens and 8 hours 39 minutes for teens](https://www.commonsensemedia.org/press-releases/two-years-into-the-pandemic-media-use-has-increased-17-among-tweens-and-teens), before schoolwork. One device-free meal or hour makes connection a household practice, not a punishment.

The contract grower point hit me. Those farmers are trapped by debt on barns they were told to build. A phaseout without a buyout is just cruelty to rural families.

Lifestyle · Sep 23, 2026 · Should factory farming be phased out within ten years?

I agree the harm is real, but how do you price it? Is my grocery store trip worth the same as someone's clinic visit? A flat payout feels arbitrary and a tiered one feels invasive to administer.

Business · Sep 23, 2026 · Should companies be required to pay customers when they misuse location data?